A-1 - Encouraged by What You Read?

It's a little gross to consider, but every one of us has mites that live in our hair follicles. Most of the mites are found near our cheeks, nose, forehead, eyebrows, and eyelashes. These mites—which have elongated bodies and are semi-transparent when viewed under a microscope—are commonly called face mites. (The scientific moniker for face mites is Demodex folliculorum). These creatures are tiny arachnids (related to spiders) that consume dead skin cells and oil associated with hair follicles and sebaceous glands. D. folliculorum is usually harmless to humans, but in some instances can cause skin and eye problems.

Remarkably, scientists know very little about face mites despite their close relationship with humans. Scientists don't have a full understanding of the role mites play in human health nor do they know how these creatures are transmitted from human to human. To address this lack of understanding, an international team of scientists, headed up by an investigator from the California Academy of Sciences, recently characterized the genetic variability of D. folliculorum.1

Not only did their work turn out to be a landmark study—it also carries implications for human origins models.

Studying Mite Genetic Variability

These researchers analyzed D. folliculorum mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequences isolated from 70 people who had ancestries from different parts of the world (Africa, Europe, Asia, and Latin America). They discovered different versions (called haplotypes) of face mite mtDNA that corresponded to the geographic ancestry of the human test subjects. In other words, people with a family history from Africa, Europe, Asia, and Latin America harbored face mites with characteristically distinct mtDNA, respectively.

The research team also discovered that the human hosts retained the same face mites after moving to new geographical locations. For example, they discovered that people who were born in Asia but later relocated to the United States had face mites characteristic of people from Asia, even after living in the United States for many years. The investigators also uncovered several instances in which people with African ancestry had D. folliculorum strains similar to African people groups, even though their ancestors came to the United States several generations ago.

The investigators learned that parents and children had the same face mites; but seldom did they observe the same types of face mites for people from different family units.

From these observations, the scientists concluded that face mite infection requires close and sustained physical contact and, therefore, occurs most frequently from parent to child. This pattern of transference closely mirrors the transmission of genetic material (which, of course, is from parent to child). Consequently, the genetic variability of face mites can serve as a proxy for the genetic variability of their human hosts.

In fact, the researchers point out that the pattern for the global genetic variability of face mite mtDNA is exactly what would be expected if the out-of-Africa model for humanity's origin is valid.

Accordingly, face mites infected human hosts shortly after humanity originated and then were carried with humans as they migrated around the world. Over time, distinct genetic variants of face mites emerged in geographically distinct regions of the world. Molecular clock analysis of the face mite genetic variability places their origin between 2 to 3 million years ago, well before modern humans appeared on the scene. However, the researchers from the California Academy of Sciences note that the mutation rates of mtDNA for parasitic arthropods is known to be 100-times faster than in nonparasitic arthropods.2 Considering this correction to the mutation rate of face mite mtDNA, the origin of human face mites aligns with the origin of modern humans, particularly the out-of-Africa model.

Face Mites and the Out-of-Africa Model

The out-of-Africa model proposes a scenario for human origins that closely aligns with the biblical description.

  1. Humans originated recently—around 100,000 years ago, plus or minus 20,000 years or so.
  2. Humans originated at a single location, namely East Africa—close to where some Bible scholars think the Garden of Eden was located.
  3. Humans originated from a small population of individuals.

Moreover, analysis of the genetic variability of human mtDNA (which provides insight into the origin of the maternal lineage) indicates that humanity traces back to a single ancestral sequence that could be interpreted as a single woman. Likewise, characterization of human Y-chromosomal DNA (which provides insight into the origin of the paternal lineage) indicates that all men trace their origin back to a single ancestral sequence that could be interpreted as a single man.

Though often presented and discussed within the context of the evolutionary paradigm, this model has profound biblical implications. If humanity's genesis happened in the way Scripture describes, then genetic diversity patterns observed among people groups around the world would be very similar to those discovered by anthropologists.

The agreement between the genetic variability pattern of face mites and that of humans provides independent support for the out-of-Africa model and, consequently, for the biblical account of humanity's beginnings.

Check out more from Reasons to Believe @ Reasons.org

About The Author

Dr. Fazale Rana

I watched helplessly as my father died a Muslim. Though he and I would argue about my conversion, I was unable to convince him of the truth of the Christian faith. I became a Christian as a graduate student studying biochemistry. The cell's complexity, elegance, and sophistication coupled with the inadequacy of evolutionary scenarios to account for life's origin compelled me to conclude that life must stem from a Creator. Reading through the Sermon on the Mount convinced me that Jesus was who Christians claimed Him to be: Lord and Savior. Still, evangelism wasn't important to me - until my father died. His death helped me appreciate how vital evangelism is. It was at that point I dedicated myself to Christian apologetics and the use of science as a tool to build bridges with nonbelievers. In 1999, I left my position in R&D at a Fortune 500 company to join Reasons to Believe because I felt the most important thing I could do as a scientist is to communicate to skeptics and believers alike the powerful scientific evidence - evidence that is being uncovered day after day - for God's existence and the reliability of Scripture. [...] I dedicated myself to Christian apologetics and the use of science as a tool to build bridges with nonbelievers. Fazale "Fuz" Rana discovered the fascinating world of cells while taking chemistry and biology courses for the premed program at West Virginia State College (now University). As a presidential scholar there, he earned an undergraduate degree in chemistry with highest honors. He completed a PhD in chemistry with an emphasis in biochemistry at Ohio University, where he twice won the Donald Clippinger Research Award. Postdoctoral studies took him to the Universities of Virginia and Georgia. Fuz then worked seven years as a senior scientist in product development for Procter & Gamble.

Email Sign-up

Access updates, news, Biblical teaching and inspirational messaging from the world's most powerful Christian voices.

Thank you for signing up to receive updates from TWR360.

Required information missing