As human bodies age, thermodynamics, gravity, and electromagnetism take their toll. And what is true for human beings is also true for planets and moons.

As planets and moons get older, thermodynamics, gravity, and electromagnetism take their inevitable toll. Astronomical bodies begin with a magnetic attractiveness, but over time that attractiveness wanes and eventually vanishes. Some retain magnetism a lot longer than others.

Earth is the only known rocky body that has retained a strong magnetic field—key for advanced life—for several billion years. Recent measurements on magnetic minerals in ancient Greenland rocks show that Earth’s magnetic field has remained stronger than 0.1 gauss (10 microtesla) for at least the past 3.7 billion years.1

History of the Moon’s Magnetic Field
Other rocky bodies have not been so fortunate. The surface magnetic field of Mercury is only 1 percent that of Earth’s and part of that field comes from solar wind interaction.2 Analysis of Apollo lunar rocks reveal that when the Moon was younger than 0.9 billion years (4.47–3.57 billion years ago) it had a magnetic field strength ranging from 1 to 40 microtesla (0.01–0.40 gauss).3 This is comparable in strength to Earth’s present-day magnetic field of 25–65 microTesla (0.25–0.65 gauss).4

At that time, a core dynamo—powered by thermal convection in a liquid outer core—sustained the Moon’s relatively strong magnetic field. (This was similar to what has operated on Earth for the past 3.7+ billion years.) At 3.57 billion years ago the Moon’s core dynamo shut down. From 3.57 to 2.0 billion years ago mantle precession powered a lunar magnetic field 10–100 times weaker. Mantle precession occurred when the Moon was much closer to Earth. Earth’s gravity at that time generated powerful tidal forces on the Moon and caused it to wobble. This wobbling stirred up the fluid in the Moon’s core, which generated a weak magnetic field.

As the Moon continued to move away from Earth, the wobbling became less pronounced. By 2.0 billion years ago, the wobbling no longer could sustain a lunar magnetic field.

There is some evidence for an even weaker lunar magnetic field existing about 1.5 billion years ago.5 Such a field could have been generated by the process of the lunar core gradually crystallizing.

End of the Moon’s Magnetic Field
When the Moon’s core becomes fully crystallized, the Moon’s magnetic field will completely disappear. A team of six planetary scientists endeavored to determine if indeed the Moon has lost its magnetic field, and if so, when.6 The team used a superconducting rock magnetometer to look for any indication that the matrix glass in the two youngest lunar breccia brought back from the Apollo 15 mission showed evidence for an ambient lunar magnetic field.

Lunar breccia 15465, dated to be 0.44±0.01 billion years old, revealed an upper limit for a lunar magnetic field of 0.06 microtesla (0.0006 gauss). Lunar breccia 15015, dated to be 0.91±0.11 billion years old, revealed an upper limit of 0.08 microtesla (0.0008 gauss). Consequently, the six planetary scientists concluded that the Moon lost its magnetic field sometime between 1.92 and 0.80 billion years ago.

How the Lunar Magnetic Field Persisted
That the Moon retained a magnetic field until 1.92–0.80 billion years ago is remarkable. Mars, which is nine times more massive than the Moon, lost its magnetic field about 4.2 billion years ago.7 However, unlike Mars and Earth’s other planetary partners, the Earth-Moon system experienced a different formation history. About 95 million years after its formation through the accretion of planetesimals, the primordial Earth collided/merged with Theia, a planet 20–90 percent the primordial Earth’s mass.

The collision/merger of the primordial Earth and Theia substantially modified Earth and gave rise to the formation of the Moon.8 One consequence of the collision/merger is that both the Moon and Earth ended up with an interior composition and structure different from that of the other solar system planets and moons. This consequence explains, in large part, why the Moon and Earth have had such long-lasting magnetic fields.

Persistence and Strength of Earth’s Magnetic Field
Meanwhile, Earth’s magnetic field has persisted until the present time. The Moon transitioned through three different magnetic field generation mechanisms: (1) core convection, (2) mantle precession, and (3) core crystallization. Earth has experienced only core convection.

Earth’s core, unlike Mars’s core or the Moon’s, contains a low abundance of elements lighter than iron,9 but it has an extremely high abundance of thorium and uranium. In large part due to the heat released from the radiometric decay of thorium and uranium, Earth’s outer core of predominantly ferrous (easily magnetized) elements has remained liquid throughout Earth’s history. Therefore, core convection—the most powerful of the magnetic field generation mechanism—has operated during the entire 3.8-billion-year history of life on Earth.

Earth’s powerful, enduring magnetic field rebuffs deadly high-energy particles flowing in from the Sun and equally deadly high-energy cosmic rays. Earth’s magnetic shield not only protects surface life, it also protects oceans and lakes and Earth’s atmosphere. Without the shield, solar radiation would quickly sputter away both Earth’s atmosphere and surface water into interplanetary space. Such was the fate of Mars some 4 billion years ago.

The Moon has had a remarkable magnetic field history. Yet Earth’s magnetic field history is far more remarkable. It is thanks in part to that history that life has been able to thrive on Earth in great abundance and diversity for 3.8 billion years. Without that great abundance and diversity persisting for 3.8 billion years, human beings and global civilization would be impossible.10

Featured image: Full Moon
Credit: Gregory H. Revera, Creative Commons Attribution


Interested readers might enjoy this short 3-minute video produced by NASA showing the 4.47-billion-year history of the Moon:

Check out more from Reasons to Believe

  1. Alexandra Witze, “Greenland Rocks Suggest Earth’s Magnetic Field Is Older Than We Thought,” Nature 576 (December 10, 2019): 347, doi:10.1038/d41586-019-038907-7.
  2. Brian J. Anderson et al., “The Magnetic Field of Mercury,” Space Science Reviews 152 (May 2010): 307–39, doi:10.1007/s11214-009-9544-3.
  3. Ian Garrick-Bethell et al., “Early Earth Magnetism,” Science 323, no. 5912 (January 16, 2009): 356–59, doi:10.1126/science.1166804; Erin K. Shea et al., “A Long-Lived Lunar Core Dynamo,” Science 335, no. 6067 (January 27, 2012): 453–56, doi:10.1126/science.1215359; Benjamin P. Weiss and Sonia M. Tikoo, “The Lunar Dynamo,” Science 346, no. 6214 (December 5, 2014): id. 1246753, doi:10.1126/science.1246753; Ian Garrick-Bethell et al., “Further Evidence for Early Lunar Magnetism from Troctolite 76535,” Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets 122, no. 1 (January 2017): 76–93, doi:10.1002/2016JE005154.
  4. C. C. Finlay et al., “International Geomagnetic Reference Field: The Eleventh Generation,” Geophysical Journal International 184, no. 3 (December 2010): 1216–30, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04804.x.
  5. A. L. Fagan et al., “Ages of Globally Distributed Lunar Paleoregoliths and Soils from 3.9 Ga to the Present,” Earth, Moon, and Planets 112, issue 1–4 (2014): 59–71, doi:10.1007/s11038-014-9437-7.
  6. Saied Mighani et al., “The End of the Lunar Dynamo,” Science Advances 6 (January 1, 2020): eaax0883, doi:10.1126/sciadv.asx0883.
  7. Jafar Arkani-Hamed, “Life of the Martian Dynamo,” Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 196–97 (April 2012): 83–96, doi:10.1016/j.pepi.2012.02.008; Jafar Arkani-Hamed and Peter Olson, “Giant Impacts, Core Stratification, and Failure of the Marian Dynamo,” Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets 115, no. E7 (July 2010): id. E07012, doi:10.1029/2010JE003579.
  8. Hugh Ross, “Increasing Lunar Coincidences Lead to ‘Philosophical Disquiet,'” Today’s New Reason to Believe (blog), March 3, 2014,; Hugh Ross, Improbable Planet: How Earth Became Humanity’s Home (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2016), 48–60.
  9. Harry Y. McSween Jr., G. Jeffrey Taylor, and Michael B. Wyatt, “Elemental Composition of the Martian Crust,” Science 324, no. 5928 (May 8, 2009): 736–39, doi:10.1126/science.1165871.
  10. Ross, Improbable Planet, 78–219.


About The Author

Dr. Hugh Ross

Reasons to Believe emerged from my passion to research, develop, and proclaim the most powerful new reasons to believe in Christ as Creator, Lord, and Savior and to use those new reasons to reach people for Christ. I also am eager to equip Christians to engage, rather than withdraw from or attack, educated non-Christians. One of the approaches I’ve developed, with the help of my RTB colleagues, is a biblical creation model that is testable, falsifiable, and predictive. I enjoy constructively integrating all 66 books of the Bible with all the science disciplines as a way to discover and apply deeper truths. 1 Peter 3:15–16 sets my ministry goal, "Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect, keeping a clear conscience." Hugh Ross launched his career at age seven when he went to the library to find out why stars are hot. Physics and astronomy captured his curiosity and never let go. At age seventeen he became the youngest person ever to serve as director of observations for Vancouver's Royal Astronomical Society. With the help of a provincial scholarship and a National Research Council (NRC) of Canada fellowship, he completed his undergraduate degree in physics (University of British Columbia) and graduate degrees in astronomy (University of Toronto). The NRC also sent him to the United States for postdoctoral studies. At Caltech he researched quasi-stellar objects, or "quasars," some of the most distant and ancient objects in the universe. Not all of Hugh's discoveries involved astrophysics. Prompted by curiosity, he studied the world’s religions and "holy books" and found only one book that proved scientifically and historically accurate: the Bible. Hugh started at religious "ground zero" and through scientific and historical reality-testing became convinced that the Bible is truly the Word of God! When he went on to describe for others his journey to faith in Jesus Christ, he was surprised to discover how many people believed or disbelieved without checking the evidence. Hugh's unshakable confidence that God's revelations in Scripture and nature do not, will not, and cannot contradict became his unique message. Wholeheartedly encouraged by family and friends, communicating that message as broadly and clearly as possible became his mission. Thus, in 1986, he founded science-faith think tank Reasons to Believe (RTB). He and his colleagues at RTB keep tabs on the frontiers of research to share with scientists and nonscientists alike the thrilling news of what's being discovered and how it connects with biblical theology. In this realm, he has written many books, including: The Fingerprint of God, The Creator and the Cosmos, Beyond the Cosmos, A Matter of Days, Creation as Science, Why the Universe Is the Way It Is, and More Than a Theory. Between writing books and articles, recording podcasts, and taking interviews, Hugh travels the world challenging students and faculty, churches and professional groups, to consider what they believe and why. He presents a persuasive case for Christianity without applying pressure. Because he treats people's questions and comments with respect, he is in great demand as a speaker and as a talk-radio and television guest. Having grown up amid the splendor of Canada's mountains, wildlife, and waterways, Hugh loves the outdoors. Hiking, trail running, and photography are among his favorite recreational pursuits - in addition to stargazing. Hugh lives in Southern California with his wife, Kathy, and two sons.

Email Sign-up

Sign up for the TWR360 Newsletter

Access updates, news, Biblical teaching and inspirational messages from powerful Christian voices.

Thank you for signing up to receive updates from TWR360.

Required information missing