People in the twenty-first century encounter no shortage of global warming news. For many of us, seeing the words "temperature tipping point" may rouse concern or alarm. For researchers who study Earth's climate, two factors help them know whether we're reaching a tipping point. One involves measuring carbon dioxide levels due to human activity, and the second monitors how plants absorb carbon dioxide, thereby mitigating its effects.

Life on Earth's landmasses currently mitigates about 30% of carbon emissions by human activity.1 Life in the oceans mitigates another 15%.2 Without this alleviation, more greenhouse gases would be pumped into the atmosphere and Earth's surface environment would be much warmer than it is.

As scientists seek to find a balance, they ask three questions: (1) Can Earth's terrestrial life mitigate more carbon emissions by human activity? (2) Is terrestrial life already doing the best it can possibly do to mitigate carbon emission by human activity? and (3) Is Earth's terrestrial life doomed to mitigate less and less carbon emission by human activity? A team of six ecologists and cyber system analyzers led by Katharyn Duffy sought answers and published their initial research findings in a recent issue of Science Advances.3

Biogenic Greenhouse Gas Mitigation
By far, the most significant greenhouse gas subject to mitigation by Earth's life is carbon dioxide. (Methane, the second most significant greenhouse gas regulated in part by life, is minor by comparison.)

This mitigation is determined by this formula: amount of carbon dioxide removed from Earth's atmosphere by photosynthesis minus the amount of carbon dioxide added to Earth's atmosphere by respiration. It's a key balance between photosynthesis and respiration. Both vegetation and animals respire carbon dioxide. Only cyanobacteria and vegetation photosynthesize. Currently, the net amount of carbon removed from Earth's atmosphere by terrestrial life is 2.6 petagrams (2.6 trillion kilograms) per year.4

Known major factors that affect biogenic greenhouse gas mitigation include surface temperature, carbon dioxide percentage in the atmosphere, droughts, and plant mortality. Increasing global mean (sum of all the values divided by the number of values) surface temperatures cause respiration to rise but the rate at which it rises slows down with increasing surface temperatures.5 For atmospheric carbon dioxide levels between 150 and 650 parts per million, rising atmospheric carbon dioxide levels enhance photosynthesis rates. For atmospheric carbon dioxide levels above 400 parts per million, rising atmospheric carbon dioxide levels hinder respiration but not in any major way until atmospheric carbon dioxide levels rise above 900 parts per million.6

Biogenic Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measurements
Exactly how much increasing surface temperatures affect rates of respiration and photosynthesis has not been well understood. Scientists know that the terrestrial biosphere, as opposed to the oceanic biosphere, has been responsible for most of the changes observed so far. For this reason, Duffy's team focused on making accurate measurements of correlations between global mean temperature rise and terrestrial respiration and photosynthesis rates.

The team used data from the world's largest continuous carbon monitoring network, known as FLUXNET,7 to determine the temperature dependence of global rates of respiration and photosynthesis. They did a correlation analysis across 1,500 site years of the network of daily data from all major biomes (ecological communities) and plant functional types.

Their analysis revealed that photosynthesis rates peak at 18°C (64°F) and 28°C (82°F) for C3 and C4 plant systems, respectively. C3 plants comprise about 95% of Earth's plant biomass, including virtually all trees and food crops such as wheat, rice, barley, and soybeans. Only 8,100 plant species use C4 photosynthesis, but these species include sugar cane and corn.

Duffy and her colleagues noted that the global mean temperature of the warmest three-month period during the past decade has already exceeded 18°C. However, currently less than 10% of Earth's biosphere experiences mean temperatures greater than 18°C that result in the degradation of carbon uptake from the atmosphere. This limited degradation occurs because exposures in these regions to mean temperatures above 18°C typically are limited to two months.

The bad news from the analysis by Duffy's team is that a modest increase in the global mean temperature will cause a degradation of carbon uptake for biomes that cycle 40–70% of all terrestrial carbon. The rainforests of the Amazon and Southeast Asia and the taiga (subarctic) forests of Canada and Russia will be among the first biomes to exceed a temperature mean of 18°C for five months or more.

The research team ends their paper with a warning. Any further increase in the global mean temperature will cause a slow rise in terrestrial respiration rates and a sharp decline in rates of photosynthesis. The graphs they present in their paper imply that any increase in photosynthesis resulting from a higher carbon dioxide level in the atmosphere is likely to be more than offset by a decrease in photosynthesis as a consequence of the higher global mean temperature generated by the increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide.

Recommended Responses
How do we responsibly respond to such research findings? "Temperature tipping point" is in the title of the paper. For more than a decade the Paris Agreement and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) have declared that a further global mean temperature increase of 1.5–2.0°C will put humanity past the tipping point where there will be no opportunity to prevent or recover from catastrophic economic, ecological, and health consequences. I present data and explanations in my book Weathering Climate Change8 that affirm the conclusions of the Paris Agreement and the IPCC.

Duffy's team's paper establishes that we are at the temperature tipping point now. While the kinds of economic, ecological, and health catastrophes I describe in Weathering Climate Change are not imminent, conditions will inevitably worsen with any measurable increase in the global mean temperature.

My concern, though, is that such news will generate alarm and panic and tempt political leaders to take strident action without full consideration of probable unintended consequences. In my view, we don't need to pass and enforce Draconian laws.

By providing strong economic incentives to stabilize the global mean temperature, people will perhaps take action quickly enough to prevent the tipping point revealed by Duffy's team and avert catastrophe. There are many solutions to global warming that can be implemented in the short term that will enhance the global economy, the world's ecosystems, and the health, wealth, and well-being of people everywhere.9

DSC08231

Featured image: Wheat, a C3 Photosynthesis Crop Image credit: Hugh Ross

Check out more from Reasons to Believe @Reasons.org

Endnotes
  1. Trevor F. Keenan et al., "Recent Pause in the Growth Rate of Atmospheric CO2 Due to Enhanced Terrestrial Carbon Uptake," Nature Communications 7 (November 8, 2016): id. 13428, doi:10.1038/ncomms13428.
  2. Keenan et al., "Recent Pause in the Growth Rate."
  3. Katharyn A. Duffy et al., "How Close Are We to the Temperature Tipping Point of the Terrestrial Biosphere?" Science Advances 7, no. 3 (January 13, 2021): id. eaay1052, doi:10.1126/sciadv.aay1052.
  4. Keenan et al., "Recent Pause in the Growth Rate."
  5. Keenan et al.
  6. Astrid C. Wittmann and Hans-O. Pörtner, "Sensitivities of Extant Animal Taxa to Ocean Acidification," Nature Climate Change 3 (August 2013): 995–1001, doi:10.1038/nclimate1982; Hugh Ross, "Complex Life's Narrow Requirements for Atmospheric Gases," Today's New Reason to Believe (July 1, 2019).
  7. Gilberto Pastorello et al., "The FLUXNET2015 Dataset and the ONEFlux Processing Pipeline for Eddy Covariance Data," Scientific Data 7, no. 225 (July 9, 2020), doi:10.1038/s41597-020-0534-3.
  8. Hugh Ross, Weathering Climate Change (Covina, CA: RTB Press, 2020), 23–46, 187–98.
  9. Ross, Weathering Climate Change, 199–218.

About The Author

Dr. Hugh Ross

Reasons to Believe emerged from my passion to research, develop, and proclaim the most powerful new reasons to believe in Christ as Creator, Lord, and Savior and to use those new reasons to reach people for Christ. I also am eager to equip Christians to engage, rather than withdraw from or attack, educated non-Christians. One of the approaches I’ve developed, with the help of my RTB colleagues, is a biblical creation model that is testable, falsifiable, and predictive. I enjoy constructively integrating all 66 books of the Bible with all the science disciplines as a way to discover and apply deeper truths. 1 Peter 3:15–16 sets my ministry goal, "Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect, keeping a clear conscience." Hugh Ross launched his career at age seven when he went to the library to find out why stars are hot. Physics and astronomy captured his curiosity and never let go. At age seventeen he became the youngest person ever to serve as director of observations for Vancouver's Royal Astronomical Society. With the help of a provincial scholarship and a National Research Council (NRC) of Canada fellowship, he completed his undergraduate degree in physics (University of British Columbia) and graduate degrees in astronomy (University of Toronto). The NRC also sent him to the United States for postdoctoral studies. At Caltech he researched quasi-stellar objects, or "quasars," some of the most distant and ancient objects in the universe. Not all of Hugh's discoveries involved astrophysics. Prompted by curiosity, he studied the world’s religions and "holy books" and found only one book that proved scientifically and historically accurate: the Bible. Hugh started at religious "ground zero" and through scientific and historical reality-testing became convinced that the Bible is truly the Word of God! When he went on to describe for others his journey to faith in Jesus Christ, he was surprised to discover how many people believed or disbelieved without checking the evidence. Hugh's unshakable confidence that God's revelations in Scripture and nature do not, will not, and cannot contradict became his unique message. Wholeheartedly encouraged by family and friends, communicating that message as broadly and clearly as possible became his mission. Thus, in 1986, he founded science-faith think tank Reasons to Believe (RTB). He and his colleagues at RTB keep tabs on the frontiers of research to share with scientists and nonscientists alike the thrilling news of what's being discovered and how it connects with biblical theology. In this realm, he has written many books, including: The Fingerprint of God, The Creator and the Cosmos, Beyond the Cosmos, A Matter of Days, Creation as Science, Why the Universe Is the Way It Is, and More Than a Theory. Between writing books and articles, recording podcasts, and taking interviews, Hugh travels the world challenging students and faculty, churches and professional groups, to consider what they believe and why. He presents a persuasive case for Christianity without applying pressure. Because he treats people's questions and comments with respect, he is in great demand as a speaker and as a talk-radio and television guest. Having grown up amid the splendor of Canada's mountains, wildlife, and waterways, Hugh loves the outdoors. Hiking, trail running, and photography are among his favorite recreational pursuits - in addition to stargazing. Hugh lives in Southern California with his wife, Kathy, and two sons.



Email Sign-up

Sign up for the TWR360 Newsletter

Access updates, news, Biblical teaching and inspirational messages from powerful Christian voices.

Thank you for signing up to receive updates from TWR360.

Required information missing